标签归档 上海娱乐导航

  • 首页   /  
  • 标签： "上海娱乐导航"

Hong Kong police rally to protest against 7 police sentenced chief executive candidate Ye Liushu-yi came to cheer.

According to Hong Kong media reports on the evening of 22nd, the Hong Kong Police Officers’ Association and the Hong Kong Police Inspectors’ Association held a special congress at the Mong Kok Police Recreation Club in the evening to discuss the incident that seven police officers who beat social worker Zeng Jianchao were convicted and imprisoned for two years, as well as the support and follow-up arrangements for seven people. A large number of active and retired police officers and their families were present in the evening.

In mid-October 2014, the Hong Kong media released a video of the police allegedly beating Zeng Jianchao, a member of the Citizens Party, when they dispersed the Occupy Central demonstrators. The case was announced on February 14, and the defendant was found guilty of all crimes. Three days after remand, on the morning of 17th, the court announced that all seven defendants were sentenced to two years without probation. In addition, the defendant Chen Shaodan was also convicted of ordinary assault and sentenced to one month, to be executed concurrently.

Hong Kong police rally to protest against 7 policemen being sentenced

According to the Hong Kong Eastern Network, more than 38,000 people attended the peak of the conference, including off-duty and retired police officers. Legislative Councillors Ge Peifan, Liang Meifen and He Junyao also showed up. The participants shouted the slogan of "fighting for justice and returning to the rule of law", hoping to raise money to help the families of the seven policemen, and demanded legislation to protect public officials and make the crime of insulting public officials.

The candidate for the Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Mrs Regina Ip, was present as an observer. She said that the morale of the police force was damaged, so she came to the scene to cheer up, and that she and the New Democracy Party were willing to donate money to the families of seven sentenced police officers.

Chief Executive Candidate Mrs Regina Ip.

Participants in the rally included active police officers, retired police officers and their families, etc. Earlier, the Police Officers’ Association called for police officers to enter the venue at 5 pm, and more and more people participated in the rally. By 6: 30, the nearby road was forced to explode, and cars could not enter. The police officers who maintained order at the scene called on their comrades to stand back on the road from time to time. Some participants spontaneously maintained order and asked everyone to take out their appointment cards in advance. Some participants shouted slogans, referring to "making history depends on everyone" and "working hard for everyone".

The conference was originally scheduled to start at 7 pm, but due to too many participants, a large number of people were still unable to enter the venue, and it is expected that it may not be able to start at 7: 30.

Chen Zuguang, chairman of the Hong Kong Police Officers’ Association, said at the meeting that the seven policemen were in a good mental state in prison and had expressed their willingness to appeal the case. They were worried about the financial burden of their families and the impact of the current situation on the appeal. The association immediately applied to the Commissioner of Police for internal fund-raising, and the application was approved on Monday (20th). It began to accept donations from colleagues yesterday (21st) in the hope of providing support to the seven police officers in the shortest possible time. Tan Huizhu, president of the founding association, also promised to organize a platform to receive public support.

Chen Zuguang went on to point out that the purpose of the gathering tonight is to regain dignity, not to be insulted unreasonably, to demand legislation to protect the dignity of law enforcers, and to write to the Chief Executive, to demand legislation to protect all public officials, to commit the crime of insulting public officials, and not to be insulted by words or actions when performing their duties.

Guo Baicong, chairman of the Hong Kong Police Inspector Association, said that he was saddened by the imprisonment of the seven policemen. On behalf of the superintendent, he fully supported the internal fund-raising activities; Li Zhan ‘an, Chairman of the Police Inspectors Association, and representatives of the Overseas Inspectors Association also spoke on the stage.

When the participants entered the venue, a woman holding a card with the words "Seven police officers divided their positions, her heart ached and her heart was bleeding" was so emotional that she once cried. After the disturbance, she found that she was not a police officer or a police officer’s family and was driven out. She was booed at the scene.

Slowly but surely, SVS Virtual Rowing League dived into the third champion club.

/SVS Virtual Rowing League/

Club ROUND 3

SVS virtual rowing league

The third round ended on October 22nd.

finally

DEEP DIVE deep dive Wu Shenyang

Become the men’s team [the star of the bright field]

Royal hong kong yacht club Anna Lee Fisher

Become a women’s group [Star of the Bright Field]

DEEP DIVE became the champion club of this site.

Men’s team

Shen Qian Wu Shenyang player

Won the G2 championship in the men’s open group with the advantage of rolling grade.

The strength is evident.

In the women’s group,

Royal hong kong yacht club Anna Lee Fisher

Play very stably

Won the G1 and G2 rounds of women’s open group.

The two contestants deserve to be the "stars of the bright field"

Champion club:

DEEP DIVE

(All the results shown in this article are preliminary)

Poke the video number below

View the highlights of the event

??

first half

Women’s lightweight G1 champion:

Royal hong kong yacht club _ Xu Yongqi

Women’s Open Group G1 Champion:

Royal hong kong yacht club _Anna Lee Fisher

Men’s lightweight G1 champion:

Deep dive _ Teng Teng

Men’s open G1 champion:

Deep dive _ Wang Hao

Swipe left and right to view G1 scores of some groups.

In the first half of the women’s lightweight group G1, Xu Yongqi of royal hong kong yacht club showed her strength at the beginning of the competition, and won the championship easily and slowly!

The women’s open group G1, SDBC Zhang Huan and royal hong kong yacht club’s Anna Lee Fisher gave us a short fight in the middle of the competition. In the end, the champion of this group was won by royal hong kong yacht club’s Anna Lee Fisher, and SDBC Zhang Huan and CEIBS Chen Cheng ranked second and third respectively!

Royal hong kong yacht club won all the women’s team titles in the first half!

In the men’s lightweight group G1, the strength of the players in each club is very close. In the second half of the competition, it was a competition between Shenqian Tengteng, Deyingle Cai Guoqing and royal hong kong yacht club Li Daiyao, and finally Shenqian Tengteng won the championship in this group!

In the men’s open group G1, Alastair Robert Kelly of royal hong kong yacht club had a huge lead at the beginning. It is worth mentioning that the player is also very similar to the characters in his virtual competition. But in the end, Wang Hao took the lead in rushing to win the championship, while the second, third and fourth place were less than 0.5 seconds apart!

At this point, the deep diving club won the men’s two groups!

second half

Women’s lightweight G2 champion:

Huamu _ Xie Junwei

G2 champion of women’s open group:

Royal hong kong yacht club _Anna Lee Fisher

Men’s lightweight G2 champion:

Deep dive _ Teng Teng

Men’s open G2 champion:

Deep dive _ Wu Shenyang

Swipe left and right to view G2 scores of four groups.

In the second half of the women’s lightweight group G2, Hua Mu Xie Junyi started to exert her strength. In the middle of the game, she opened a very big gap and led her opponent by more than 50 meters, easily winning the championship!

In the women’s lightweight G2 competition, Anna Lee Fisher of royal hong kong yacht club played a stable role as always and won the first place; Wang Haoqian of Huamu won the second place, and the third place was taken by Lijuan Fan, who dived deeply. The strength of the second and third place was equal, and the score was very close!

In the men’s lightweight G2 competition, the competition is fierce. Flowers and trees, deep diving and Central Europe almost go hand in hand. At 600 meters, deep diving Teng Teng began to exert his strength, adjusted his pace and prepared for the sprint. He has gained obvious advantages in the last quarter and finally won the championship!

In the men’s open group G2, deep dive Wu Shenyang took the lead in breaking the distance, established his great advantage at 500 meters, and finally won the championship of this group with the strength of rolling!

Round 4 October 29

Round 5 November 22

Original title: "Slow and steady SVS virtual rowing league DEEP DIVE becomes the third champion club! 》

Read the original text

Approaching the 17th National Congress： the first venue in 40 years-Jingxi Hotel

Topic: Welcome to The 17th National Congress of the Communist Party of China


　　　　On March 2nd, waiters in Beijing Jingxi Hotel dressed in red greeted the delegates attending the Fifth Session of the Tenth National People’s Congress. China News Agency issued Mao Jianjun photo


　　　　China news agency, Beijing, October 7 th Title: Guanjing West Hotel, the 40-year venue


　　　　China News Service reporter tensor


　　　　At the west end of Chang ‘an Avenue, opposite the CCTV building, a row of tall poplars stand side by side along the long blue glass fence, as tall as guards at the door. They jointly guard the Jingxi Hotel, which has the reputation of "the crown of the venue" in China. This hotel, which has completed dozens of people’s congresses, party congresses and central plenary sessions with high quality and high standards, was particularly eye-catching before the 17th National Congress of the Communist Party of China.


　　　　Coincidentally, this "old" hotel, which is closely related to China politics, celebrated its 43rd birthday before the 17th National Congress. Can not help but trigger a series of historical nostalgia.


　　　　京西宾馆属于军队编制，归属总参谋部管理局。一九六四年建成时，北京市除北京饭店、民族饭店、前门饭店、华侨大厦外，它的建筑设备算是最好的。所以开馆伊始，一九六四年国庆节，京西宾馆就接待了阿尔及利亚、匈牙利、捷克、保加利亚、巴基斯坦、缅甸等六个国家的党政代表团和来自其他三十四个国家的六十一个专业代表团，并接待了当年十月二十日召开的第三届全国人民代表大会东北、中南、解放军三个代表团和大会的二百六十多名工作人员，此后四十几年间，全国人大几乎所有代表团都曾入住此地，包括台湾代表团。


　　　　京西宾馆被认为是“最安全的宾馆”。据说,它的管理与保卫工作与中南海、人民大会堂和钓鱼台同等级别。在文革冲击中，由于京西宾馆的特殊身份，保护了一大批中共高级干部。


　　　　三层的第一会议室是这座楼里最神秘的所在，因为十一届三中全会就是在这里召开的，改革开放的大政方针就是在这间会议室里确定的。京西宾馆引以为傲，毕竟，这间屋子创造了历史，改变了历史。现在这间特殊的会议室重门深锁，据说这里面翻修后仍“修旧如旧”，从椅子到喝茶的玻璃杯样式等都保持着原样。


　　　　Because of this, Jingxi Hotel is also known as the most difficult hotel in Beijing. Identity cards and work permits are useless, and you need to have a notice of the meeting, and you have to be picked up by the conference group to get in. In addition to the uncompromising strictness, the guards on guard will definitely leave a deep impression on people with their handsome appearance and tall and mighty image.


　　　　There are many parking spaces in the courtyard of Jingxi Hotel, and the planning is neat. In addition to the hotel building for accommodation, there is also a special conference building. In recent years, a large advertising column has been set up on the inner side of the blue glass fence, which has blown a little commercial atmosphere into this hotel with political bearing. In recent years, Jingxi Hotel has not only received important political meetings, but also started to receive some groups with relaxed content, mainly for sightseeing, although it is still not open to the public.


　　　　The conference building of Jingxi Hotel is a Soviet-style building with solemn atmosphere. There are dozens of conference rooms of different sizes on each floor of the conference building. The long aisle is covered with thick red carpets, but most people in the past can keep quiet.　　


　　　　In 2001, Jingxi Hotel underwent a major refit, and the facilities for meetings at all levels were more perfect. In addition to the security inspection device at the entrance of the hall, each meeting room is specially equipped with a series of security facilities. Some high-level secret meetings require participants to store their mobile phones in special lockers, which can shield radio signals and ensure that the contents of the meeting will never be leaked.


　　　　At the same time, in order to provide appropriate targeted services for various conferences, Jingxi Hotel has a special team, that is, telephone female soldiers responsible for communication security. They installed additional telephones according to the requirements of different meetings, and the indoor telephone answering and outdoor climbing lines were all completed by female soldiers. It is said that during major meetings, an operator has to answer tens of thousands of calls a day. Moreover, because some minority delegations live in Jingxi Hotel during the annual "two sessions", each of these female soldiers can speak more than a dozen dialects.


　　　　The most popular among the guests is the dining in Jingxi Hotel, where local flavors can taste the most authentic craftsmanship. Especially during the "two sessions", representatives from the southwest like spicy food. From Laoganma in Guizhou to oily spicy food in Sichuan, restaurants only prepare seven or eight kinds of peppers. The restaurant also prepared roast whole sheep and hand-grabbed lamb chops for Xinjiang delegates, ghee and Ciba for Tibet delegates, and specially set up sugar-free seats, soft food seats and vegetarian seats to meet the needs of different delegates. However, people who are familiar with this place are told by word of mouth that the yogurt made by Jingxi Hotel is delicious.


　　　　Now it is getting closer and closer to the 17th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, and Jingxi Hotel has also entered the preparation period before the meeting. A few days ago, ten painters from Jiangsu donated their carefully created works to Jingxi Hotel, adding new scenery to this special venue.

Editor: Wang Yuxi

2023 Taobao Tmall JD.COM 618 activity time and gameplay strategy, 618 red envelope password collection entrance

　　2023 Taobao Tmall JD.COM 618 activity is coming! Not much nonsense, let’s learn about the specific gameplay of the 618 event in 2023.

　　First, Taobao Tmall 618 Activity Raiders

　　Activity time: 5/24 (3) -6/20 (2)

　　1. Pre-sale period: 20: 00 on May 26th (Friday) to 18:00 on May 31st (Wednesday).

　　Pre-sale venue entrance: 18￥ CZ0001 FDhmdLlT3Nw￥ (copy the password and open the mobile phone Taobao to enter the venue).

　　2. Spot preheating: 5/29 (1) 00: 00 ~ 5/31 (3) 23:59

　　3. Spot time: 00: 00 on June 1st (4th) to 23:59 on June 3rd (6th)

　　4. Super red envelopes

　　The first phase of distribution time: 20: 00 on May 29th to 24: 00 on June 3rd, and the use time is May 31st to June 3rd.

　　The second phase of distribution time: June 4-June 20, the use time is June 15-June 20.

　　How to get it: search for [red envelope to hand 5777] by hand Taobao app or copy the password: 37 CZ3457I5YHDLSXNXE to get it from mobile phone Taobao.

　　Red envelope plus date: May 31st, June 5th, June 14th and June 19th.

　　The platform super red envelope is universal for the whole platform, and you can get a red envelope of up to 22,888 yuan three times a day.

　　5. Full reduction: full 300 yuan minus 50 yuan.

　　★ Deposit payment: 20: 00 on May 24th (3rd) to 21:59 on May 31st (3rd).

　　★ Final payment: 6/1 (IV) 00: 30 ~ 6/3 (VI) 23:59

　　Second, JD.COM 618 activity strategy

　　Activity time: 5/23 (3) -6/20 (2)

　　1 Pre-sale period: 20: 00 pm on May 23rd (Tuesday)-May 31st (Wednesday)

　　2. A good start: 5/31 (3) 20: 00 ~ 6/3 (6) 23:59

　　3. Category Day: 00: 00 on June 4th (day) to 23:59 on June 15th (day)

　　4. High tide period: June 15 (4) 20: 00 ~ June 18 (Sunday) 23:59.

　　5. Renewal period: 00: 00 on June 19 (I) to 23:59 on June 20 (II)

　　6. Enjoy a red envelope in Beijing

　　Collection time: From 19: 00 on May 29 to 23:59 on June 18, you have at least one chance to receive the Beijing red envelope every day.

　　Access: Open your mobile phone and search for [Red Packet Welfare 551] in JD.COM to access the access page.

　　Tips: You can squat at 0: 00 on the first day of each stage, and generally you will get a big bag, that is, you will squat at 19: 00 on May 29, 0: 00 on June 5 and 0: 00 on June 12, and the probability of getting a big red envelope is greater ~

　　7. Full deduction: full 299 yuan MINUS 50 yuan.

　　★ Final payment: starting at 21:00 on May 31st (Wednesday).

　　Third, 618 money-saving strategy

　　(1)88vip card, Tmall brand 15% discount, large coupons can be received, and it is easy to buy furniture and home appliances.

　　(2) Remember to collect coupons, attention coupons, membership coupons, membership coupons, etc. for all coupons in the store.

　　(3) All the gold coins can be collected, and 100 coins arrive in 1 yuan. Although the deduction is not much, many a mickle makes a mickle.

　　(4) Super red envelopes are available every year. Don’t forget to get them! (Hand Taobao app search [red envelope to hand 5777] to receive)

　　(5) Take the initiation ceremony, go to the store to register members directly, and you will enjoy points when you buy things, as well as some additional registered gifts and membership coupons with different amounts.

　　(6) Take repurchase vouchers, especially some big brands, and now you can go to the store to buy a sample, so that when double 11 places an order again, he will already be their old customer, and will give them a gift.

　　(7) Remember the first gift, save a few pieces to dozens of pieces, so when you go shopping, if you remember to change to a new number (new gift), so as not to miss it!

　　(8) Get a money-saving card and return it with a red envelope, which is valid for 3 days.

　　(9) Get the shopping money, make sure that the brand you want to rush can be recharged, and remember that this can be refunded.

　　(10) Go to the live room to get the coupon, and the brand to be rushed has been determined. Go to the live room to get the benefits, and the exclusive link will be cheaper or more gifts than if you place an order directly in the store.

　　(11) There are benefits one hour before and one hour after the event, and some shops also have discounts and benefits at the last hour before the event ends. If you don’t catch up with the time ahead, you can go and see it at the end, and there may be unexpected surprises.

　　(12) If the price of daily necessities is 100+, it is more cost-effective to pay the down payment. If it is less than 100, it is more cost-effective to make up the bill and reduce the amount. Make up the full reduction in several times, and make up the bill with large pieces and small pieces.

　　(13) For products with insured price, if there is a price reduction during the activity, you can apply to the merchant for making up the price difference.

The article suspects that Jet Li has not stepped out of ＂autism＂ and exposed his nephew’s medical history.


Creative group photo

[Click to watch the exclusive video]

Jet Li abandoned martial arts and went from writing to acting in Ocean Paradise. It was too deep for autistic children to enter the play.

　　　　　　　 Movie network news(Photo/Qian Jiayi/Xie Yawei) A father and his autistic son were sitting on a small wooden boat floating on the sea. They tied their feet to the rope connected to the boat and jumped into the sea together. This is the first episode of the movie Ocean Paradise. In this film, which focuses on autistic children, Jet Li "abandons martial arts and follows literature" for the first time, playing an unfortunate and brave father, and the article challenges the role of autistic children. At the media meeting held on May 5th, the article’s eyes were a little dull, and it seemed that it had not completely pulled away from the role. When Jet Li talked about the original intention of filming this film, he shared with media reporters his own nephew’s experience of autism.


Jet Li


essay

The article plays the role of "autistic child" and goes into too deep a problem to pull away from the role.

　　　　　　　 In the film, the article challenged the role of "autistic children" and did a lot of homework in advance. "Before shooting, I went to experience life, stayed with those children with autism and observed them. I once said that if I just imitated them and couldn’t really integrate into this role, I wouldn’t act." His "Dafu" has a symbolic gesture, and his left hand is always raised to wave to others. This detail is also specially designed in the article. "I have observed those children with autism, and everyone has some symbolic gestures. This is their expression, and we normal people can’t understand the meaning." For Dafu’s swimming and diving talent, the article also made great efforts, from a "landlubber" to a "swimmer".

　　　　　　　 From the exposed trailer, it is not difficult to see that the "autistic child" played by the article has dull eyes and always likes to giggle foolishly, and the role is vividly portrayed by him. For the article with excellent acting skills, it may be because he is too deeply involved, and the state in real life seems to be still not completely detached from the role, especially his eyes still look dull. However, he himself does not think so. "I am out of the role, and this conference is to advocate everyone to pay attention to myself."

Jet Li exposed his family’s medical history and was dissatisfied with the article playing "son"

　　　　　　　 Jet Li and his One Foundation have sponsored countless people who need help. This time, they chose to make a film focusing on "autistic children". In addition to being enthusiastic about public welfare, there is also a very personal reason. "Just four or five years ago, after my sister’s child was criticized by the teacher at school, he was stimulated and shut himself in his room without communicating with anyone. This is the performance of autism. After nine months, through the patient guidance and careful care of his relatives, he Recalling the past, Jet Li said with emotion that he wanted to tell everyone through this film that "autistic children" really needed the care of people around them, and he admired the courage and strength of their parents.

　　　　　　　 When talking about the original "Dafu" candidate, Jet Li said frankly that the director recommended the article to him, and he immediately rejected it. "At that time, I thought he was very unsuitable, so I asked them to look for it again. As a result, a total of eight people came for an interview. After reading it, the article was the best one among them, and finally I decided to use him." At the scene, I took a bite of "Jie Dad" and laughed happily when I heard Jet Li’s praise. Now he has become a volunteer in "Dad" and "One Foundation" and joined the ranks of charity.


Kwai Lun Mei


Zhu Yuanyuan

Kwai Lun Mei’s film "Love Action for Autistic Children" was launched without revealing his true face.

　　　　　　　 Kwai Lun Mei plays a clown in a circus in the film. Almost every time she appears, she wears a clown costume, and her face is painted with funny clown makeup. She can’t see her true colors at all. "The role I play is an orphan. When I meet ‘ Dafu ’ , she felt that two people are connected by the same fate, in order to make ‘ Dafu ’ Happy, she often tells him stories and communicates in this way. " Kwai Lun Mei said that after acting in this film, she realized that for those children with autism, although they don’t want to communicate with the people around them, they can feel it if you give them a look and a hug.

　　　　　　　 Ding Ziyin, an autistic patient, was also invited to the event that day. Now she is 16 years old. She was diagnosed with autism at the age of 5, but she has made remarkable achievements in piano. She played two pieces in a row, although her skills were not exquisite enough, she won the warmest applause. Through the day’s press conference, the film’s main creator officially launched the love relay activity of caring for posters and graffiti in four major cities for autistic children — — "All my life, start and go together". At that time, the activities will be held in Beijing, Qingdao, Dalian and Shanghai. Autistic children in each city will personally paint a public welfare poster of "Ocean Paradise" and finally display it in Shanghai, the love terminal. Jet Li said that the moral of this activity is that these children will never be lonely, and someone will always give them and their families love and help, and accompany them to go on.

More wonderful pictures on the next page

In January, 88,914 Volkswagen cars were recalled in China, accounting for over 90%.

　　After the recall baptism of China automobile market, which reached a record high last year, in January 2016, the recall event returned to normal. Judging from the contents of eight automobile recall announcements issued by the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine in January, the total number of cars recalled in the domestic automobile market last month was 88,914; Compared with the 91,615 vehicles recalled in the same period in January 2015, the number has not changed much. In terms of passenger cars, the car brands (enterprises) involved in the recall last month were Volkswagen, Hyundai, Jeep, Mercedes-Benz and Geely. In the field of commercial vehicles that have little to do with the private car market, a total of 4,519 large trucks produced by four automobile companies, including GAC Hino, need to be recalled.

　　Judging from the recalled models and quantity, Volkswagen became the main force of the recall in January this year. Among them, the models involved include Tuwei, Yiou, Scirocco, Scirocco R, Cross-border Golf, Golf Travel Edition, Golf R, Magotan Travel Car, Magotan All-Road Vehicle, Volkswagen CC, Xia Lang Automobile and Touareg Hybrid Vehicle, and all of them are imported models; In terms of quantity, it reached 80,203 vehicles, accounting for more than 90% of the total domestic car recalls in January.

　　As for the reasons for the recall, although the problems are varied as before, there were some "God recalls" last month. For example, Guangzhou Automobile Hino Automobile Co., Ltd., Shanghai Huadong Construction Machinery Factory Co., Ltd. and Xuzhou Liebherr Concrete Machinery Co., Ltd. recalled 4,518 commercial vehicles. The reason for the recall was that "the driver’s manual attached to the vehicle lacked the record of the starting pressure range", and the processing process was only "replacing the qualified driver’s manual for free". Although this recall seems to be "nonsense" on the surface, if you think about it carefully, it also shows that the domestic car recall system is actually making continuous progress. After all, safety is the most important thing.

　　List of domestic car recalls in January

　　Domestic commercial vehicles such as GAC Hino.

　　Since January 4, 2016, GAC Hino Automobile Co., Ltd., Shanghai Huadong Construction Machinery Factory Co., Ltd. and Xuzhou Liebherr Concrete Machinery Co., Ltd. have recalled the following vehicles, totaling 4,518 vehicles. (1) GAC Hino Automobile Co., Ltd. produced 4,511 series vehicles of GAC Hino brand SS64, SH42, FS2P and FY2P from March 1, 2013 to January 31, 2015; (2) There are 3 GH series vehicles of Huajian brand produced by Shanghai Huadong Construction Machinery Factory Co., Ltd. from June 3, 2013 to January 23, 2015; (3) There are 4 series vehicles of GN34 and GN44 of Liphull brand produced by Xuzhou Liebherr Concrete Machinery Co., Ltd. from March 1, 2013 to January 31, 2015.

　　Release date: January 4, 2016

　　Reason for the recall: The driver’s manuals attached to some vehicles within the scope of this recall lack the records of the starting air pressure range, which does not meet the relevant provisions in China’s Technical Conditions for Motor Vehicle Operation Safety GB7258-2012. The above three companies will replace qualified driver’s manuals for vehicles within the scope of this recall free of charge.

　　Volvo FM chassis car

　　Since January 16, 2016, Shenyang Jietong Fire Engine Co., Ltd. recalled a Volvo FM chassis car assembled on November 24, 2014, totaling one.

　　Release date: January 14, 2016　

　　Reason for recall: Due to assembly problems in the production line of the recalled vehicle, the fastening nut of the U-bolt connecting the leaf spring and the front axle may be loose in the vehicle with single steering front axle with leaf spring suspension, which may lead to the abnormal installation position of the front steering axle and the girder, which may lead to abnormal sound of the front steering axle and premature tire wear. Shenyang Jietong Fire Engine Co., Ltd. will repair the vehicles within the recalled scope free of charge to eliminate potential safety hazards.

　　Modern GENESIS

　　Since January 20, 2016, Hyundai Motor (China) Investment Co., Ltd. has recalled some imported GENESIS cars with 18-inch Hankook tires produced between January 29, 2014 and April 30, 2015. According to the company’s statistics, there are 71 cars in Chinese mainland.

　　Release date: January 20, 2016

　　Reason for the recall: Some vehicles within the scope of this recall have insufficient stress dispersion in the deformed parts of the tire sidewall due to design reasons. During driving, the tire may have noise or the chassis may have abnormal vibration. After driving for a long time, the tire sidewall surface may crack, posing a safety hazard. Hyundai Motor (China) Investment Co., Ltd. will replace the above-mentioned affected recalled vehicles with four Kumho tires free of charge according to the maintenance procedures.

　　VOLKSWAGEN

　　Since January 25th, 2016, Volkswagen (China) Sales Co., Ltd. has recalled some imported 2009-2014 models of Tuwei, Yiou, Scirocco, Scirocco R, Cross-border Golf, Golf Travel Edition, Golf R, Magotan Travel Car, Magotan All-Road Vehicle, Volkswagen CC and Xia Lang Automobile.

　　Release date: January 20, 2016

　　Reason for recall: For some vehicles within the scope of this recall, due to design reasons, foreign objects may enter the steering column switch electronic module. Under certain circumstances, the cables inside the module will be damaged, which will affect the electrical communication and horn function of the driver’s airbag, and lead to the failure of the horn. The airbag cannot be deployed normally in the event of a vehicle accident. Based on the configuration of different vehicles, this failure will also affect the functions of the telephone and audio buttons on the steering wheel, posing a safety hazard. In view of this defect, the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine issued the Risk Warning Notice of the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine on steering column defects of some imported Volkswagen on September 14, 2015. For the vehicles involved in this recall, Volkswagen (China) Sales Co., Ltd. will entrust an authorized dealer to install a cover sealing ring for the steering column switch electronic module involved in this recall free of charge to prevent foreign objects from entering.

　　Special reminder: Volkswagen also said that if the customer finds that the airbag fault indicator light on the dashboard lights up before the recall, please contact the authorized dealer of Volkswagen imported cars immediately, and the dealer will replace this part for the vehicle that needs to replace the steering column switch electronic module.

　　Jeep Grand Cherokee, Commander

　　Since January 28th, 2016, Chrysler (China) Automobile Sales Co., Ltd. has recalled some 2008 imported Jeep Grand Cherokee cars produced from March 21st, 2007 to May 12th, 2008 and 2008 imported Jeep Commander cars produced from April 3rd, 2007 to May 12th, 2008.

　　Release date: January 20, 2016

　　Reason for recall: For some vehicles within the scope of this recall, the anti-theft module may turn the ignition key from the "On" position to the "Accessory" position when the vehicle is driving on a bumpy road or due to the driver’s misoperation, resulting in the engine stalling. Chrysler (China) Automobile Sales Co., Ltd. will inspect all vehicles that may have this hidden danger and replace the ignition switch module for consumers free of charge.

　　Geely EC8

　　Since January 25th, 2016, Zhejiang Haoqing Automobile Manufacturing Co., Ltd. has recalled some Geely EC8 vehicles produced from August 21st, 2012 to December 25th, 2013, totaling 1,593 vehicles.

　　Release date: January 22, 2016

　　Reason for recall: Due to the manufacturer’s reasons, some vehicles within the scope of this recall may not be able to accurately transmit the signal of the vehicle side air curtain in extreme cases, resulting in the side air curtain not being properly deployed. Geely Automobile will carry out free maintenance on the vehicles within the scope of recall to eliminate potential safety hazards.

　　Mercedes benz C 200 Travel Car

　　From February 1st, 2016, Mercedes-Benz (China) Automobile Sales Co., Ltd. recalled some imported 2015 Mercedes-mercedes benz C 200 touring cars, and the production date was from March 16th, 2015 to April 15th, 2015. According to the company’s statistics, 194 cars were involved in Chinese mainland.

　　Release date: January 27, 2016

　　Reason for recall: For the vehicles within the scope of this recall, the illumination angle of the headlights on the right side of the vehicle may not meet the requirements of China’s mandatory standards due to vehicle manufacturing reasons. Mercedes-Benz (China) Automobile Sales Co., Ltd. will recall the vehicles through authorized dealers, check the headlights of the affected vehicles free of charge and make adjustments as needed.

　　Volkswagen Touareg Hybrid Electric Vehicle

　　From February 18th, 2016, Volkswagen (China) Sales Co., Ltd. recalled some imported 2011-2014 Volkswagen Touareg hybrid vehicles, and the production date was from September 6th, 2010 to August 13th, 2014. According to the company’s statistics, there were 2,120 vehicles involved in Chinese mainland.

　　Release date: January 29, 2016

　　Reason for recall: If water leaks into the trunk of the vehicle within the scope of this recall and cannot be discharged, the water will accumulate under the trunk floor and cannot be found visually. If too much water is accumulated, it will soak the high-voltage battery and cause a short circuit. In some cases, it may lead to ablation of the two poles of the high-voltage battery and even fire. Volkswagen (China) Sales Co., Ltd. will entrust an authorized dealer to install a drain valve in the spare tire groove of the trunk of the recalled vehicle free of charge. (Text/photo reporter Huang Si)

I have been an artist agent for 20 years.

Author | Weinika

Editor | Li Chunhui

?

The frequency of hot search on star brokers is getting higher and higher, and it is almost catching up with the star himself.

?

However, Wan Gang gave her domestic toothpaste after complaining about her agent, and Adi made a blog explosion to force her to lose weight. In addition, there are a lot of gossip about brokers. Before, Peng Yuchang’s so-called "amateur" girlfriend was exploded as TuTu, the agent of Tianhao Shengshi, and later Jackson Wang was rumored to be the love object of Jiang Zhenyu …

Although it is nothing new for brokers to walk from behind the scenes to the stage, Yang Tianzhen, Hua Du and Long Danni, known as the three godmothers in the entertainment circle, have made great efforts in variety shows this year, and there is a tendency to market themselves as "flow artists".

?

And fans also spare no effort to "help" brokers debut, "xx company closed down" is almost the slogan of every fan. It is a daily "exposure" way for brokers and companies to be scolded by fans for their rights protection.?

For example, last month, YCY fans swiped their message in Weibo, demanding the replacement of an unprofessional brokerage team, forcing YCY himself to respond: "I really have no experience in firing the boss … loan operation?"

?

Fans are heartbroken, but the agent is not the "retainer" of the artist. But two years ago, in a similar incident, the film and television of the Tang Dynasty came forward for Hugh and fired Hugh’s agent for inaction.

?

From the brilliant "star company" Huayi, to the idol brokerage company whose fans are busy "teaching people to be human", artists have been brokerage for 20 years, and the market has changed several times, but the problem has not changed much.

?

Film and television companies’ "love and hate" for artists’ brokers

?

Everything has to start with the earliest brokerage business of film and television companies in the mainland.

?

Film and television companies have unique advantages as artists’ brokers. Actors are an indispensable part in making a drama or film. If you cooperate more, you will sign the actors and form a fixed team of the company. This is the embryonic form of artists’ brokerage in the grass-roots period. Established production companies Huayi, Rongxinda, Hairun, Tangren, Huanrui, Huace and Noon Sunshine are such representatives.

?

It should be pointed out that the emperor under the Hong Kong system does not belong to this category. Obviously, the mobility of Emperor artists is far less than that of mainland companies.The emperor’s right to speak for his own artists is also much higher than that of mainland companies. Why is there such a big difference?

?

Huayi is a typical representative. In 2000, more than 40 artists, including Fan Bingbing, Li Bingbing, Ren Quan and David, joined Huayi Brothers. They all had the same agent-Wang Jinghua, who was called the first generation of domestic brokers.

?

Wang Jinghua’s generation of brokers, also known as nanny brokers, take care of the stars’ filming work and daily life in every possible way, forming a strong emotional bond.

?

But such ties are easily broken by interests, and the right to speak has never been in the hands of film and television companies from beginning to end. In addition to acting, stars also have foreign income such as advertising, and the proportion with film and television companies is usually "three or seven points", with film and television companies taking three and stars taking seven.

?

Even if Huayi was aware of it, he began to engage in "option incentive" bundling and transferred part of his equity to try to retain artists. But in the turbulent capital market at that time, stars became the object of being chased. They are not satisfied with the small kindness of a little equity. After all, they set up a company casually, and there is a pile of capital rushing to invest.

?

Huayi’s 2009 financial report also showed that "artist brokerage and related services" accounted for 20% of the annual income, which had dropped to 8% in 2013, and this business will no longer be displayed in 2014.By 2014, dozens of artists, including Fan Bingbing, Zhou Xun, Zhao Liying and Wang Baoqiang, had terminated their contracts with Huayi.

Huanrui and Tang people also failed to escape this robbery. Yang Yang, Tang Yan and Yang Mi, the famous artists of Huanrui, successively canceled their contracts; There were also two cases in the Tang Dynasty that caused a lot of uproar. After Kenny Lin won the case and terminated the contract successfully, Jiang Jinfu failed to do so, and did not leave until one year later.

?

Artists’ brokers make film and television companies love and hate each other, except for the instability caused by the departure of popular artists.In fact, there is a natural contradiction between film and television production and the profit-seeking direction of artists’ brokers.Sunlight at noon, a veteran production company, reluctantly cut the meat and cancelled the artist brokerage business.

?

It is inevitable that film and television production seeks to maximize profits and compress film remuneration, but this is contradictory to the pursuit of artists’ agents. At noon, Sunshine always insisted that the actor’s pay should not exceed 1/3 of the total investment. However, as its actors became popular because of the drama, the pay rose, and the problem arose.

Artist brokers are more and more like the "chicken ribs" of film and television companies. Having said that, there are still many popular artists who are their own bosses and go on the old road of "film and television production+artist brokerage". Yang Mi took his own artists to perform Jiaxing’s play, and a film "to the sky kingdom" brushed the faces of many artists, such as "Off the Mirror" Vin, "Little Fox" Dilraba and "Emperor" Vengo.

?

However, this star company that relies too much on artists’ brands is more risky than the film and television companies in the grass-roots period. For example, the "Treasure Company" Xitian, its artists Huang Hai Bo, Jiang Jinfu and Wu Xiubo had accidents one after another, and I don’t know what was wrong with Feng Shui.

?

Especially in the Internet era, dealing with public relations crisis, publicity and marketing, and fan operation is becoming more and more important, which has spawned a number of pure service-oriented brokerage companies represented by one heart. At the same time, the idol brokerage company, which is quite different from its style, has more and more right to speak, and it has begun to rise a new model of "inverted 37" and "inverted 28"-economic companies get seven and artists get three.

?

Traditional brokers and idol brokers have very different discourse rights.

?

In 2014, Yang Tianzhen, who worked as a propaganda director in Fan Bingbing’s studio for six years, smelled the smell of "the times have changed" and founded Yixin Entertainment, aiming at caring for all artists as customers.

?

Yang Naizhen, who single-handedly transformed Fan Bingbing from a carpet star in Cannes into a "Fan Ye", gave full play to his advantages in the new era. From turning Lu Han and LAY, the four sons who returned to China, into "silly roe deer" and "little sheep", to turning the divorce crisis in Yuqi Zhang into a declaration of "independent women", they all performed brilliantly.

However, the one-dimensional ability has also led to widespread criticism that Yixin’s artists value marketing and despise their works. Lu Han, LAY, Yuqi Zhang and Nana Ou-yang left one after another. Yixin’s business and top management have undergone major adjustments this year, and Yang Tianzhen has also started the business of "plus size women’s wear".

?

Relatively speaking, idol companies based on amateur draft are much less troubled in this respect.Although the contract was cancelled constantly, it won by sea tactics. As long as the draft brand is still there, we can constantly explore new people and deliver fresh blood to the company.

From the TV talent show "Super Girl" in 2004 to the video platform talent show "Creation 101" in 2018, countless trainees and cultivating idol companies have risen, and the times have been magnificent, Lehua, Kunyin, Siba Media and Awakening the East. "Jealous" traditional veteran film and television companies, such as Huace and Emperor, have also begun to send trainees to talent shows.

?

Long Danni, the godmother of the draft, also went from Tianyu Media, which is co-operated by Hunan Taiwan, to the establishment of Wow, Wow and Wow, which is deeply bound with Tencent. This kind of company’s contract with amateur stars is always "overbearing". Dong Lei, a lawyer who handled a large number of Tianyu cancellation cases, revealed in an interview:Wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow, wow

?

Sean Xiao, who became popular in The Untamed, suffered from the termination of the contract. Now, although he has set up a personal studio, he is still affiliated with the name of Wow.

There are also a few draft stars who insist on canceling their contracts at huge compensation. There was a 4-year dispute between Chen Chusheng and Tianyu, and the superimposed liquidated damages amounted to 38 million. Later, KUN and the former brokerage company dissolved the contract according to the sea, and was claimed as much as 80 million yuan in liquidated damages. Fortunately, as "ikun" hoped, they lost the case. However, there are still countless unsuccessful cancellations, such as KATTO of Kunyin Entertainment, who was buried in the snow because of the failure to cancel the contract.

?

Speaking of "snow storage", if it weren’t for the idol company’s use of this power on Xiao Aidou, we would have forgotten that this incident, which often happens in Han Yu, Japan and Hong Kong and Taiwan entertainment in its heyday, almost didn’t exist in the mainland.

?

Take Japan as an example. How do they manage that the brokerage company can ban a popular artist and stifle the star to run the studio independently?

Rena Nonen, who was popular because of "The Sea Girl", was hidden in the snow by LesPros.

?

Before the 1990s, Japanese TV stations and artists’ offices were just ordinary cooperative relations. In the mid-1990s, Genese’s Tsuyoshi Domoto starred in "Jintianyi Juvenile Notebook" and Kimura Takuya starred in "Long Vacation", which successively won the ratings in 1995 and 1996.

?

The TV station began to use Genese artists, and the firm firmly grasped the right to speak, and began to dominate the production of TV stations, focusing on packaging and launching dramas that meet the image of its artists.

?

In fact, this hegemonic relationship is not unbreakable. Once the drama starring Genese artists is overturned, it will shake the dominance of large firms. But magically, because of the existence of the great god Kimura Takuya, almost every series is among the best in ratings, winning 10 titles from 1996 to 2016, which has maintained the ratings myth of Genese Office for nearly 20 years.

?

Because of the right to speak, large firms have laid down unwritten rules for TV stations: no artists who resign from the firms can be used. Once the artists of large firms cancel their contracts, they can’t appear on TV. Artists who dare not cancel their contracts are mostly "fish" at the mercy of any firm, and their salary level is about equal to that of ordinary civil servants. An artist who cancels his contract, no matter how popular, has no chance to play. For example, Hikari Mitsushima, who was called "the four great actresses of the new generation" by Tokyo Film Festival, left the club empty for two years.

?

On the other hand, at home, it is the other extreme. Stars always hold the right to speak in their own hands, whether they are nanny brokers or service brokers. Popular actors and idols love beans, and most of them stand on their own feet and are not bound to any company. At most, only a part of the brokerage contract, such as film and television, fashion, etc., will be handed over to a certain company for operation.

?

We have entered the retail era with many studios.

?

Retail era:

With the rise of online drama brokerage companies, the right to speak on the platform is dominant

?

The Japanese entertainment industry has broken the hegemony of brokerage companies and TV stations to some extent because of the entry of streaming media such as Netflix. Hikari Mitsushima’s younger brother, Shinnosuke Mitsushima, left the club with his sister, and even though he was banned by the TV station, he could also appear in online dramas such as Naked Supervision produced by Netflix and Song of Curry produced by bilibili.

In China, where streaming media is developing more rapidly than in Japan, video websites have gradually mastered the right to speak in the film and television circle."The brokerage company is not important, mainly depends on the artist." A casting director in the circle broke the embarrassing situation of the brokerage company.Artist brokers seem to have entered an era that is even more "chicken ribs" than the grass-roots period.

?

The main decision-making power of "watching artists" lies in the platform. Nowadays, from established film and television companies to emerging online drama production companies, most of them are working for the platform.

?

Internet platforms select artists and pay most attention to data and product matching. According to the artist’s coffee spot, match the online dramas of different orders of magnitude on the platform. Light weight and sweet pet drama made Hu Yi Tian, Li Xian, Steven Zhang and Ding Yuxi popular overnight.

And these "husbands" come from different brokerage companies, and the retail era seems to have created a prosperous scene of "a hundred schools of thought contend". Although there are many brokerage companies and individual studios, the online drama production companies behind the platform still follow the old path of Huayi and Huanrui, and develop their own artist brokerage business, such as Kung Fu Zhen Yan, Wuyuan Culture and Linghe Jiayi.

?

After all, these quality production companies have won the trust of the platform and have a certain right to speak. They also want to win the popularity of their own artists and share a piece of the artist broker’s soup.

?

However, the legacy of history can only be repaired at any time, and there can be no complete solution. For example, the contradiction between artists’ termination, tainted artists and artists’ income and compressed production costs. The new situation is that under the background that idol brokers such as Siba Media have turned to film and television production, film and television production companies have lost the advantage of "many people" in front of idol brokers who mass-produce amateur stars every year.

?

And what kind of power relationship will be formed between the platform and these star retail investors in the future, we may get a glimpse from the rumors that Leo and Allen were banned.

Read past hot articles

Entertainment hard candy has now settled in.

??Today’s headlines |?baidubaijia?| A little information?

Cat’s eye movieget awayTencent News, Netease News

Wi-Fi Master Key | Weibo | Electric Shock News

Tiger sniffing???|?Titanium media?| Zhihu | Interface | Interesting Headlines

? 21 CN recommendation |?U C headline?| Sohu Public Platform

Blue Electric E5 PLUS official picture exposure： defining the new aesthetics of family travel

The stunning appearance of the official picture is like a visual feast, redefining a new aesthetic for family travel.

In appearance, the Blue Electric E5 PLUS makes a strong debut with a minimalist futuristic design style. The body color of Aurora Green is like a bright emerald, exuding a charming charm. The smooth lines outline an elegant and dynamic outline, and every detail has been carefully carved to show an unparalleled level of craftsmanship. Whether it is still or in motion, it is like a moving work of art, adding a nobility and style to family travel.

In terms of interior space, the Blue Electric E5 PLUS has shown extraordinary strength. The two flexible seat layouts of "Big Five Seats, Enjoy Seven Seats" meet the diverse needs of different families. The 3162mm effective space in the car, with a rate of up to 66.4%, provides a spacious and comfortable riding environment for the whole family.

The space of the seven-seat model is diverse, and the second and third rows of seats can be reclined to create a spacious rest area or huge storage space in an instant. One row of legroom is spacious, and the soufflé seat gives the driver the ultimate comfort experience. The second row of seats on the five-seat model can be adjusted to 119 °, allowing passengers to enjoy comfort and relaxation.

The official debut of the Blue Electric E5 PLUS marks the birth of a new aesthetics for family travel. As the pre-sale approaches at the end of September, it will surely lead the new trend of family travel with its unique charm, excellent performance and innovative design, bringing a better travel experience to families.

The top 10 intellectual property cases and 50 typical intellectual property cases in Chinese courts in 2023

　　The General Secretary of the Supreme Leader emphasized that "one case is worth a dozen documents," vividly and profoundly explaining the important demonstration and guiding functions of cases. The 10 major intellectual property cases and 50 typical intellectual property cases released by Chinese courts in 2023 on April 22 cover intellectual property types such as patents, trademarks, copyrights, new plant varieties, anti-unfair competition and monopolies. They involve key core technological innovation, well-known brands at home and abroad, digital economy, seed industry and many other key areas and industries in the new era. They reflect the following characteristics of judicial protection:
　　First, the people’s court grasps the theme of high-quality development, strictly protects scientific and technological innovation achievements, and serves the development of new-quality productive forces.To protect intellectual property rights is to protect innovation, and the people’s courts will step up their efforts to protect innovation and creativity with the power of the rule of law."Danyu No. 405" Infringement Case of New Varieties of Corn Plants,For enterprises that have repeatedly committed deck infringement, repeated infringement, and intentional infringement, punitive compensation shall be applied in accordance with the law, effectively enhancing the confidence of agricultural researchers."Lentinan" Infringement of Technical SecretsThis paper explores the identification of the technical secrets of traditional authentic medicinal materials and the compensation for the illegal use of technical secrets, which has positive significance for the integrity and innovation of traditional Chinese medicine.
　　The second is to actively respond to social concerns and effectively safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the people.Involved in the "juvenile model" unfair competition dispute case,Responding to society’s concerns about the protection of adolescents, guiding network service providers to consciously fulfill their network obligations and social responsibilities to protect minors."Basic Funeral Services" Refusal to Trade Dispute CaseThe abuse of market dominance by public enterprises in the funeral industry shall be stopped in accordance with the law, and the interests of the people and small and medium-sized enterprises shall be effectively safeguarded.
　　The third is to explore the adjudication rules in new technologies, new business models, and new fields to serve the new economic drivers.Scientific and technological innovation has spawned new industries, new models, and new driving forces, constantly challenging the existing rules of social life. The people’s courts are facing the dual test of new technologies and new thinking in their trial work. The cases announced this year involve new issues such as copyright protection of navigation electronic map data, illegal data capture, and the prevention of transaction and resale. The people’s courts actively explore adjudication rules, clarify the boundaries of rights and interests protection, and serve the digital economy.
　　Fourth, we should strengthen equal protection and actively create a market-oriented, rule-of-law, and international business environment.exist"Siemens" trademark infringement and unfair competition case, "Michelin" trademark infringement case, "Lafite" trademark infringement and unfair competition caseThe people’s courts shall equally protect the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese and foreign parties in accordance with the law, vigorously crack down on the behavior of free-riding near famous brands, safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of foreign rights holders in accordance with the law, and promptly respond to foreign investors’ concerns about intellectual property protection.
　　The fifth is to strengthen coordination, strengthen the protection of the entire chain of intellectual property rights, and build a comprehensive protection work pattern.Intellectual property protection is a systematic project that covers a wide range of fields and involves many aspects, from review and authorization, administrative law enforcement, judicial protection to arbitration and mediation, industry self-discipline, and citizen integrity. This requires continuous improvement of the protection system, strengthening coordination and cooperation, and building a large protection pattern. Among the cases released this year, there are both cases of administrative and judicial connection, as well as cases of legal inspection cooperation.Administrative dispute involving invalidation of "facial recognition" invention patentIt clarifies the requirements for the scope, method and purpose of modification of claims in the administrative procedure of patent invalidation, and promotes the unification of administrative law enforcement standards and judicial judgment standards.Judicial punishment case involving malicious litigation of "Changgao Dianxin" trademarkIn addition to punishing the abuse of intellectual property rights in accordance with the law, the people’s courts also transfer the clues of the parties’ suspected abuse of intellectual property rights to the people’s procuratorate, and actively promote the people’s procuratorate to exercise its supervisory functions and make procuratorial suggestions in accordance with the law.
　　In the next step, the people’s courts will adhere to the Supreme Leader’s thought on socialism with Chinese characteristics for a new era as a guide, continue to deeply practice the Supreme Leader’s thought on the rule of law, focus on fairness and efficiency, and continuously improve the quality and efficiency of intellectual property trials in the new era.

The top 10 intellectual property cases in Chinese courts in 2023

　　1. A dispute over trademark infringement and unfair competition between Ximou Joint Stock Company, Ximou (China) Co., Ltd. and Ningbo Qimou Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Civil Court verdict No. 312]
　　Second, the case of infringement of trademark rights and unfair competition between a winery and Nanjing Jinmou Wine Industry Co., Ltd. [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Civil Court verdict No. 313]
　　Administrative dispute case between Beijing Zhongmou Technology Co., Ltd. and the State Intellectual Property Office and Pingmou Computer Trading (Shanghai) Company for invalid invention patent rights [Supreme People’s Court (2021) Supreme Law Zhixing End No. 556 administrative court verdict]
　　IV. Liaoning Danzhiye Technology joint stock company and Linghai Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd., Qingdao Lian Agricultural Technology Development Co., Ltd. Infringement of new plant variety rights dispute case [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Zhiminzhuan No. 2907 civil court verdict]
　　V. Beijing Simou Technology joint stock company and Beijing Baimou Technology Co., Ltd. and other copyright infringement and unfair competition disputes [Beijing Higher People’s Court (2021) Jingmin End No. 421 civil court verdict]
　　Six, Beijing Micro Network Technology Co., Ltd. and Guangzhou Jianmou Information Technology Co., Ltd. and other unfair competition disputes [Guangdong Higher People’s Court (2022) Yueminjian No. 4541 civil court verdict]
　　Case of copyright infringement by Liu Mousheng and Liu Mousheng [Shanghai Third Intermediate People’s Court (2023) Shanghai 03 Xingchu No. 23 criminal court verdict]
　　Eight, Nanjing Hanmou Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd. and Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. infringement of technical secrets dispute case [Nanjing Intermediate People’s Court of Jiangsu Province (2019) Su 01 Minchu No. 3444 civil court verdict]
　　Case of unfair competition dispute between Xiaomou Technology Co., Ltd. and Chen and Shenzhen Yunmou Technology Co., Ltd. [Civil court verdict of Wenzhou Intermediate People’s Court of Zhejiang Province (2023) Zhejiang 03 Minchu No. 423]
　　Ten, Shenzhen Tengmou Computer System Co., Ltd., Tengmou Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. and Beijing Aimou Technology Co., Ltd. Unfair competition dispute case [Tianjin Free Trade Zone People’s Court (2022) Jin 0319 Minchu No. 23977 civil court verdict]

50 Typical Intellectual Property Cases in Chinese Courts in 2023

　　Intellectual property civil cases
　　(1) Patent ownership, patent infringement, and confirmation of whether it falls within the scope of patent protection
　　1. Zhejiang Jimou Holding Group Co., Ltd. and Weimou Intelligent Travel Technology (Shanghai) joint stock company and other patent application rights dispute case [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Zhimin Zhimin Zhuan No. 2436 civil court verdict]
　　2. Beijing Jinmou Security Software Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Mengmou Network Technology Co., Ltd. Infringement of design patent dispute case [Shanghai Higher People’s Court (2022) Shanghai Minzhuan No. 281 civil court verdict]
　　3. Sichuan Huamou Lighting Technology joint stock company and Yangzhou Yumou Optoelectronic Technology Co., Ltd. Infringement of design patent dispute case [Tibet Autonomous Region Higher People’s Court (2023) Zangzhi Minzhi No. 1 civil court verdict]
　　4. Jiangsu Jiu high-tech joint stock company and Qidi Qingmou (Shanghai) New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Infringement patent dispute case [Qinghai Province Xining City Intermediate People’s Court (2023) Qing01 Zhiminchu No. 15 civil court verdict]
　　5. A dispute case between Yanmou Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Shimou Group Oumou Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. to confirm whether it falls within the scope of patent protection [Supreme People’s Court (2023) Supreme Court Zhimin End No. 4 civil court verdict]
　　(2) Cases of trademark infringement disputes
　　1. Shanghai Bimou Cosmetics Co., Ltd. and Suzhou Shimou Biological Daily Chemical Co., Ltd. and other trademark infringement disputes [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Civil court verdict No. 238]
　　2. Dispute over trademark infringement between Namou Co., Ltd. and a shopping store in Shunping County [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme People’s Court Civil Court verdict No. 277]
　　3. Panmou Door Industry Co., Ltd. and Sichuan Xinmou Door Industry Co., Ltd. and other trademark infringement and unfair competition disputes [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Civil Court verdict No. 209]
　　4. Mimou Group Headquarters and Shanghai Mimou Catering Management Co., Ltd. and other disputes over trademark infringement and unfair competition [Hubei Higher People’s Court (2022) Erzhimin End No. 190 civil court verdict]
　　5. Dispute over trademark infringement by Limou Co., Ltd., Simou Sporting Goods (China) Co., Ltd. and Nanchang Weimou Industrial Co., Ltd. [Jiangxi Higher People’s Court (2022) Gan Minzhuan No. 127 civil court verdict]
　　6. Bai a joint stock company and a (Tianjin) petrochemical joint stock company infringement of trademark rights and unfair competition dispute case [Tianjin Higher People’s Court (2023) Jinminzhuan No. 314 civil court verdict]
　　7. Beijing Kuaimou Technology Co., Ltd. and Guizhou Kuaimou Moving Co., Ltd. Infringement of trademark rights and unfair competition dispute case [Guizhou Higher People’s Court (2023) Qianminzhuan No. 261 civil court verdict]
　　8. Beimou Technology Co., Ltd. and Fucheng Bo Real Estate Intermediary Service Co., Ltd. and other trademark infringement disputes [Hebei Province Hengshui City Intermediate People’s Court (2023) Ji 11 Minzhuan No. 2075 civil court verdict]
　　9. Binzhou Zhanmou winter jujube brand management joint stock company and Lingwu Fumou jujube industry professional cooperative and other trademark infringement and unfair competition dispute case [Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Yinchuan City Intermediate People’s Court (2023) Ning 01 Zhiminzhuan No. 8 civil court verdict]
　　(3) Cases of disputes over copyright ownership, copyright infringement, and confirmation of non-infringement of copyright
　　1. Yunnan Yangmou Information Technology Development Co., Ltd. and Yunmou (Beijing) Catering Management Co., Ltd. and other copyright infringement and unfair competition disputes [Beijing Higher People’s Court (2023) Jingmin Shen No. 215 Civil Ruling]
　　2. Gong Mouping and a research institute, Yang Mouming copyright infringement dispute case [Shandong Higher People’s Court (2022) Lu Minzhuan No. 2685 civil court verdict]
　　3. Wang Mouyu and Hainan Chain Technology Co., Ltd. infringed on the right to disseminate information online [Sichuan Higher People’s Court (2023) Chuanzhimin End No. 253 civil court verdict]
　　4. Su Sports Culture Media (Beijing) Co., Ltd. and Ai TV Media (Beijing) Co., Ltd. and a joint stock company of China Electric Heilongjiang Branch infringed on the right of information network dissemination of works [Heilongjiang Higher People’s Court (2023) Heiminzhuan No. 528 civil court verdict]
　　5. Heqing Yang Yinlou Co., Ltd. and Heqing County Eight Original Handmade Silver Store Copyright Ownership and Infringement Dispute Case [Yunnan Higher People’s Court (2022) Yunminzhuan No. 2088 civil court verdict]
　　6. Xinjiang Bimouya Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. and Xinjiang Shenmou Cloud Computing Co., Ltd. infringed on the right to disseminate information on the work network dispute case [Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Higher People’s Court (2023) Xinminzhuan No. 127 civil court verdict]
　　7. Li Moufan, Da’an Yumou Grain Trading Co., Ltd. and Qianguo County Xumou Rice Industry Co., Ltd. and other copyright infringement and unfair competition disputes [Jilin Provincial Higher People’s Court (2023) Ji Minzhuan No. 127 civil court verdict]
　　8. A system joint stock company and a special automobile technology joint stock company infringement of computer software copyright dispute case [Beijing Intellectual Property Court (2021) Beijing 73 Minchu No. 345 civil court verdict]
　　9. Beijing Hongmou Technology Development Co., Ltd. and a general merchandise store in Haikou Longhua and Shanghai Xunmou Information Technology Co., Ltd. infringed on the right to distribute works [Hainan Free Trade Port Intellectual Property Court (2021) Qiong 73 Civil court verdict No. 28 in the early days of the People’s Republic of China]
　　10. Zhejiang Shengmou Network Technology Co., Ltd. and Co., Ltd. confirmed the dispute over non-infringement of copyright [Hangzhou Internet Court (2021) Zhejiang 0192 Minchu No. 10369 civil court verdict, Hangzhou Intermediate People’s Court of Zhejiang Province (2023) Zhejiang 01 Minzhan No. 453 civil court verdict]
　　(4) Cases of unfair competition and monopoly disputes
　　1. Shengmou Chemical Technology Co., Ltd. and Chen Mougang, Yuncheng Jinmou Chemical Technology Co., Ltd. infringement of technical secrets dispute case [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Zhimin End No. 816 civil court verdict]
　　2. Hubei Huimou Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd. and Zhang Mouyang, Hubei Zhimou Chemical Technology joint stock company infringement of technical secrets dispute case [Hubei Province Wuhan City Intermediate People’s Court (2021) Hubei 01 Zhiminchu No. 334 civil court verdict]
　　3. China Pingmou Life Insurance joint stock company and Linyi City Lanshan District Yunmou advertising design studio commercial slander dispute case [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court civil court verdict No. 75]
　　4. Unfair competition dispute case between an association in Tangshan City and an e-commerce company in Changsha Shun [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Civil court verdict No. 76]
　　5. Shenzhen Quanmou Technology Co., Ltd. and Mingmou (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. and other unauthorized use of goods with the same or similar decoration that have a certain impact on others [Shandong Higher People’s Court (2023) Lu Minzhuan No. 1035 civil court verdict]
　　6. Tengmou Technology (Chengdu) Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Tengmou Computer System Co., Ltd. and Jiangsu Aimou Network Technology Co., Ltd. Unfair competition dispute case [Jiangsu Higher People’s Court (2023) Su Minzhuan No. 280 civil court verdict]
　　7. Unfair competition dispute case between a certain information technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. and Xiamen Gumou Technology Co., Ltd. [Fujian Higher People’s Court (2022) Minminzhan No. 1871 civil court verdict]
　　8. Nanjing Yuanmou Information Technology Co., Ltd. and Xi’an Yuanmou Technology Co., Ltd. and Xi’an Remou Technology Co., Ltd. unfair competition dispute case [Shaanxi Higher People’s Court (2022) Shaanxi Zhimin End No. 139 civil court verdict]
　　9. Guilin Lingmou Software Co., Ltd. and Xiaomou Communication Technology Co., Ltd. and Beijing Xiaomou Mobile Software Co., Ltd. unfair competition dispute case [Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Higher People’s Court (2023) Guiminzhuan No. 196 civil court verdict]
　　10. Unfair competition dispute case between Shenzhen Mayor’s Enterprise Management Consulting Co., Ltd. and Beijing Tianmou Technology Co., Ltd. [Civil court verdict of Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court (2023) Guangdong 03 Minzhi No. 4897]
　　11. A dispute case between Guomou Technology Holdings Co., Ltd. and Guomou (Dalian) Co., Ltd. in which the unauthorized use of others has a certain impact on the enterprise name [Liaoning Province Dalian Intermediate People’s Court (2023) Liaoning 02 Minzhuan No. 6496 civil court verdict]
　　12. Beijing Baimou Technology Co., Ltd. and Guangzhou Damou Brand Planning Co., Ltd. and Jinan Shengmou Network Technology Co., Ltd. unfair competition dispute case [Chongqing First Intermediate People’s Court (2022) Yu 01 Minchu No. 3538 civil court verdict]
　　13. Unfair competition dispute case between Beijing A Yi Technology Co., Ltd., Hunan A Yi Culture Technology Co., Ltd., and Hangzhou Qun A Technology Co., Ltd. [Civil court verdict No. 2875, Xiang0105 Minchu, Kaifu District People’s Court, Changsha City, Hunan Province (2023) ]
　　14. Quanzhou Licheng Li Funeral Service Co., Ltd. and Quanzhou Ji Funeral Service Co., Ltd. refused to trade dispute case [Supreme People’s Court (2021) Supreme People’s Court Zhimin Final No. 242 civil court verdict]
　　15. Ningbo Tongmou Materials Co., Ltd. and Japan Corporation Abuse of Market Dominance Dispute Case [Supreme People’s Court (2021) Supreme People’s Court Zhimin End No. 1398 civil court verdict]
　　(5) New plant varieties, technical contract disputes, and judicial punishment cases
　　1. Anhui quan a high-tech seed industry joint stock company and Yuan agricultural high-tech joint stock company and other disputes over infringement of new plant variety rights [Anhui Provincial Higher People’s Court (2022) Anhui Minchu No. 2 Civil Ruling]
　　2. Dispute over infringement of new plant variety rights between a research institute in Zhengzhou and Chen Mouqun [Civil court verdict No. 865, Zhiminchu, Henan Province, Zhengzhou Intermediate People’s Court (2023) ]
　　3. Dispute over infringement of new plant variety rights between Dunhuang A Good Species Co., Ltd., Ulanhot Fengzhiye Co., Ltd., and Hao Moujun [Civil court verdict No. 18, 01 Zhiminchu, Hohhot Intermediate People’s Court, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (2023) ]
　　4. Dispute case of infringement of new plant variety rights by Shandong seed industry limited company and big seed industry joint stock company [Lanzhou Intermediate People’s Court of Gansu Province (2021) Gan 01 Zhiminchu No. 51 civil court verdict]
　　5. Wujiaqu City, a new energy technology Co., Ltd. and Luoyang Di Chemical Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. technical service contract dispute case [Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Sixth Division Intermediate People’s Court (2023) Bing 06 Minchu No. 4 civil court verdict]
　　6. Monkey Digital Technology Co., Ltd., Changmou International Trade Co., Ltd., and Changmou Technology Co., Ltd. Judicial Punishment Case for Infringement of Trademark Rights and Unfair Competition Disputes [Decision No. 4 of Xiang01 Division, Intermediate People’s Court of Changsha City, Hunan Province (2023) ]
　　II. Intellectual property administrative cases
　　1. Hangzhou Yuanmou medical apparatus Co., Ltd. and the State Intellectual Property Office, Hangzhou Zhuomou medical technology Co., Ltd. invalid utility model patent administrative dispute case [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Law Zhixing End No. 132 administrative court verdict]
　　2. Shanghai Zhanmou Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Minhang District Market Supervision and Administration Bureau, Shanghai Minhang District People’s Government Fines and Administrative Reconsideration Case [Shanghai Minhang District People’s Court (2022) Shanghai 0112 Xingchu No. 506 Administrative court verdict]
　　III. Intellectual property criminal cases
　　1. Su Mouqi’s Criminal Case of Copyright Infringement [Criminal Ruling No. 422 of the Intermediate People’s Court of Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province (2023) ]
　　2. The crime of counterfeiting registered trademarks by Deng Mouguang and Yan Moujiao and the crime of selling counterfeit registered trademarks by Xiao Moucheng, Liu Mouxia and Zhang Mouyan [Shaanxi Province Xi’an Intermediate People’s Court (2022) Shaanxi 01 Zhixingchu No. 6 criminal court verdict]
　　3. Hao Mouzhen’s crime of copyright infringement [Criminal court verdict No. 116, Xingchu, Jin 0106, People’s Court of Yingze District, Taiyuan City, Shanxi Province]

Brief Introduction to the Top 10 Intellectual Property Cases in Chinese Courts in 2023

　　I. Case involving "Siemens" trademark infringement and unfair competition
　　Case of trademark infringement and unfair competition dispute between Ximou Joint Stock Company, Ximou (China) Co., Ltd. and Ningbo Qimou Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Civil Court verdict No. 312]
　　[Case summary] Ximou Co., Ltd. and Ximou (China) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter collectively referred to as Ximou Company) are the rights holders of the registered trademarks of "Siemens" and "SIEMENS". The two trademarks are registered on washing machines and other goods. After long-term use and vigorous promotion by Ximou Company, they have already gained a high reputation. Ningbo Qimou Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. and other "Shanghai Siemens Electric Appliance Co., Ltd." names to be registered overseas are widely used as commercial logos in the washing machine products, product outer packaging and related publicity activities it produces and sells. Ximou Company believes that Ningbo Qimou Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. infringes its exclusive right to use its registered trademark and constitutes unfair competition, so it sued the court. The court of first instance held that the alleged infringement of Ningbo Qimou Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. did not constitute trademark infringement, but constituted unfair competition, and ruled that Ningbo Qimou Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. immediately stopped the infringement and compensated 100 million yuan for economic losses and 163,000 yuan for reasonable expenses. Ningbo Qimou Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. refused to accept it and filed an appeal. The Supreme People’s Court held that Ningbo Qimou Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. knowingly knew the popularity of the "Siemens" and "SIEMENS" trademarks, and deliberately used "Shanghai Siemens Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. on washing machine products, causing confusion and misunderstanding among consumers, which constituted trademark infringement; the use of the logo in product packaging and publicity activities also constitutes unfair competition, and should be liable for compensation. Regarding the amount of compensation, although the existing evidence is difficult to determine the actual loss of Ximou Company or the infringement profit of Ningbo Qimou Electric Co., Ltd., it is sufficient to determine that the infringement profit of Ningbo Qimou Electric Co., Ltd. has obviously exceeded the maximum limit of statutory compensation of 5 million yuan. In this case, considering that Ningbo Qimou Electric Co., Ltd. refused to provide financial information related to the infringement, which constituted evidence obstruction, the court of first instance referred to the data in the media report that the total annual sales of Ningbo Qimou Electric Co., Ltd. was 1.50 billion yuan, and based on the relevant facts of the case, calculated the sales proportion of the accused infringing products according to one-fifteenth, and then determined that it was not improper for Ningbo Qimou Electric Co., Ltd. to bear the amount of compensation of 100 million yuan. The Supreme People’s Court ruled: reject the appeal,
　　[Typical significance] The 2nd-round Moderation judgment in this case strictly applies the system of providing evidence and obstructing the infringer who deliberately fails to provide evidence and hinders the people’s court from determining the facts of the case, and makes an unfavorable handling method and judgment in accordance with the law. This case fully reflects the judicial attitude of the people’s court to strictly protect intellectual property rights, and has effectively cracked down on the behavior of maliciously clinging to the goodwill of well-known trademarks, which has played an important role in purifying the market order and creating a good business environment.
　　II. Case involving trademark infringement and unfair competition of "Lafite"
　　Case of infringement of trademark rights and unfair competition between Laimou Winery and Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Civil Court verdict No. 313]
　　[Case summary] La Winery is the owner of the "LAFITE" trademark and "CHATEAU LAFITE ROTHSCHILD" trademark (hereinafter collectively referred to as the trademarks involved), and the two trademarks are registered on alcoholic beverage products. The trademarks involved in the case have a high reputation after long-term use, and "LAFITE" and "Lafite" have established a solid relationship. On April 1, 2005, Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. applied for the registration of the "Lafite Manor" trademark on wine and other products. Since then, Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. and others have used logos such as "Lafite Manor" and "LAFEI MANOR" in the process of producing, importing and selling wine, and have promoted them on websites and trading documents. On December 23, 2016, the Supreme People’s Court issued a retrial judgment in favor of the trademark administrative department to revoke the trademark of "Lafite Manor". Lafite Winery then sued Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. and other seven defendants to the court. The court of first instance held that Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. and other seven defendants constituted trademark infringement and unfair competition, ordered them to stop infringement, and applied punitive damages. Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. refused to accept it and appealed. The Supreme People’s Court held that in the process of applying for registration and using the "Lafite Manor" trademark, Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. had malicious intent to cling to the trademark involved in the case of Lafite Winery, and did not have a good faith interest in trust. Its use of the "Lafite Manor" "LAFEI MANOR" logo constituted trademark infringement, and exaggerating the historical heritage and popularity of "Lafite Manor" wine in the publicity constituted false propaganda. Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. and other infringement malice was obvious, and the infringement circumstances were serious. According to the request of Lafite Winery, punitive compensation was applied, and Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. was ordered to compensate Nanjing Jinmou Winery Co., Ltd. for the total economic loss and reasonable expenses of 79.17 million yuan.
　　The judgment in this case points out that trademark registrants who have the intention to cling to their trademarks should not be protected, which is of positive significance for advocating market players to participate in market competition in a sincere and good faith manner, and highlights the strength and determination of the people’s court to severely punish "near famous brands" and "free riders".
　　Administrative disputes involving the invalidation of "facial recognition" invention patents
　　Beijing Zhongmou Technology Co., Ltd. and the State Intellectual Property Office, Apple Computer Trading (Shanghai) Company Invalid Patent Administrative Dispute Case [Supreme People’s Court (2021) Supreme Law Zhixing End No. 556 administrative court verdict]
　　[Case summary] Beijing Zhongzhong Technology Co., Ltd. is the patentee of the invention patent with patent number 200480036270.2 and the name is "a method for obtaining face images and facial recognition method and system". Apple Computer Trading (Shanghai) Company filed a request for invalidation of the patent right involved in the case. Beijing Zhongzhong Technology Co., Ltd. submitted the revised text of the patent claim during the examination of the invalidation of the patent right involved in the case. The State Intellectual Property Office did not accept some of the revised claims. It only made an examination decision based on the accepted part, determined that the patent involved was not creative, and declared all of them invalid. Beijing Zhongzhong Technology Co., Ltd. refused to accept it and filed a lawsuit with the Beijing Intellectual Property Court, but was not supported. Beijing Zhonghao Technology Co., Ltd. refused to accept it and appealed on the grounds that all modified claims should be accepted. The Supreme People’s Court 2nd-round Moderation held that in the administrative procedure of patent right confirmation, the maximum scope of modification of claims shall not exceed the "scope of information" stipulated in Article 33 of the Patent Law and the "scope of protection" stipulated in the first paragraph of Article 69 of the Implementing Regulations of the Patent Law. The review of whether the modification method of a certain claim belongs to "further limitation" shall only be based on whether the modified claim fully contains all the technical features of the modified claim, whether the modified claim adds technical features to the modified claim, and whether the added technical features are recorded in other claims in the original claims. Modifications to claims in administrative procedures for patent right confirmation should generally be limited to responding to the reasons for invalidation; those that reconstruct the reality of the claims in the name of overcoming the defects referred to in the reasons for invalidation may not be accepted. In this case, claims 4 and 7 are essentially the original claims and are the natural basis for examination; the technical solutions citing claims 4 and 7 in the revised claims 8-10 should also be accepted; the revised claims 11 and 12 are not in response to the modification of the reasons for invalidation, and it is not inappropriate for the State Intellectual Property Office not to accept them. Therefore, the judgment revokes the first-instance judgment and the decision to be sued, and the State Intellectual Property Office makes a new decision.
　　[Typical meaning] This case clarifies the requirements for the extent, method, and purpose of modification of claims in the administrative procedure of patent confirmation, especially the identification criteria for "further limiting" modification, which is of reference significance for the grasp of the legal standards for modifying claims in the administrative procedure of patent confirmation.
　　IV. Infringement dispute involving new varieties of corn plants "Danyu No. 405"
　　Liaoning Danye Science and Technology joint stock company and Linghai Agricultural Science and Technology Co., Ltd. and Qingdao Lian Agricultural Technology Development Co., Ltd. infringed on the right of new plant varieties dispute case [Supreme People’s Court (2022) Supreme Court Zhimin End No. 2907 civil court verdict]
　　[Case summary] Liaoning Danyu Industrial Technology joint stock company is the owner of the new variety of corn plant "Danyu No. 405". Linghai Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. infringed the variety rights of "Danyu No. 405" with the name "Ziguang No. 4" without authorization, and was found to be infringing by an effective judgment in 2015. After that, in 2019 and 2020, it continued to carry out the infringement of producing and selling the "Danyu No. 405" variety under the names "Jinyu 118" "Anyu 13" and "Danyu No. 606" respectively. Qingdao Lian Agricultural Technology Development Co., Ltd. is the seller of the alleged infringing seeds. Liaoning Dan Industrial Technology Co., Ltd. then sued the court, requesting that Linghai Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. and Qingdao Lian Agricultural Technology Development Co., Ltd. stop infringing and jointly compensate a total of 3 million yuan for economic losses and reasonable expenses (with 1.50 million yuan as the compensation base, and 1 times the punitive compensation). The court of first instance held that the calculation base of punitive damages could not be determined, so it applied the statutory compensation judgment Linghai Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. stopped infringing and compensated a total of 1 million yuan for economic losses and reasonable expenses. Liaoning Dan Industrial Technology Co., Ltd. refused to accept and appealed. The Supreme People’s Court 2nd-round Moderation held that the infringement of Linghai Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. has a long time, a wide geographical area, and a large scale, and has repeatedly committed deck infringement and repeated infringement. The infringement is intentional and obvious, and the infringement circumstances are bad, so it should bear punitive compensation liability. Refer to the number of "Danyu No. 405" seeds that Linghai Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. believes can be harvested by breeding 400 mu of infringing seeds and the gross profit on sales, which has basically satisfied the 1.50 million yuan compensation base claimed by Liaoning Danye Industrial Technology Co., Ltd., and then according to the compensation base of 1.50 million yuan and 1 times the punitive compensation, the judgment is changed to support the full amount of Liaoning Danye Industrial Technology Co., Ltd. 3 million yuan lawsuit claim.
　　[Typical meaning] This case makes it clear that the base of punitive compensation can be determined based on the evidence in the case, and cannot simply apply statutory compensation because it is difficult to calculate accurately. The judgment of this case reflects the determination and judicial attitude of the people’s court to fully implement the punitive compensation system, reducing the difficulty of rights holders in accordance with the law, effectively playing the deterrent effect of punitive compensation, and effectively making the infringer pay a heavy price.
　　V. Navigation electronic map copyright infringement and unfair competition disputes
　　Beijing Simou Technology joint stock company and Beijing Baimou Technology Co., Ltd. and other copyright infringement and unfair competition disputes [Beijing Higher People’s Court (2021) Jingminzhuan No. 421 civil court verdict]
　　[Case summary] Beijing four science and technology joint stock company began to carry out electronic map research and development and promotion since 2002, and created the 15Q4 Internet electronic map and 16Q2 Internet electronic map (hereinafter collectively referred to as the rights map). In 2013, Beijing four science and technology joint stock company and Beijing hundred Technology Co., Ltd. signed a "cooperation agreement", agreeing to authorize Beijing hundred Technology Co., Ltd. to use the rights map until the end of 2016. Beijing Simou Technology Co., Ltd. and its affiliates claimed that after the contract expired, Beijing Baimou Technology Co., Ltd. and its affiliates used navigation electronic maps that were substantially similar to the rights map in the six accused application software operated by "Baidu Map", "Baidu CarLife" and "Baidu Navigation", which infringed their copyright and constituted unfair competition, and then sued the court. The court of first instance held that the navigation electronic maps used by Beijing Baimou Technology Co., Ltd. in the application software constituted copyright infringement, and ordered the company and its affiliates to stop the infringement, apologize, eliminate the impact, and jointly and severally compensate for economic losses of 64.50 million yuan and reasonable expenses of more than 920,000 yuan. Beijing Baimou Technology Co., Ltd. refused to accept it and appealed. The 2nd-round Moderation of the Beijing Higher People’s Court held that the rights map constitutes a graphic work under the copyright law. For the massive map data, through the comparison of 30 secret notes, 125 internal roads, 47 sea-expanding administrative area maps and 44 model maps provided by the right holder, it can be determined that Beijing Baimou Technology Co., Ltd. and its affiliates used navigation electronic maps that were substantially similar to the rights map in the six accused applications operated after the expiration of the "Cooperation Agreement", infringing the copyright of Beijing Simou Technology joint stock company. In view of the fact that the copyright law has been applied to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the right holder, it is not appropriate to apply Article 2 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law for repeated protection. The appeal was dismissed and the original judgment was upheld.
　　[Typical meaning] Data is a key element of the digital economy. This case is a typical case of navigation electronic maps being protected by copyright law. The case not only conducts in-depth analysis of the elements of navigation electronic maps that constitute graphic works, but also makes useful explorations on the substantive similarity comparison of massive map data, highlighting the important role of intellectual property judicial trial services in safeguarding the digital economy.
　　VI. Cases involving unfair competition of "data"
　　Beijing Weimou Network Technology Co., Ltd. and Guangzhou Jianmou Information Technology Co., Ltd. and other unfair competition disputes [Guangdong Higher People’s Court (2022) Yueminjian No. 4541 civil court verdict]
　　[Case summary] Beijing Jianmou Network Technology Co., Ltd. is the operator of Sina Weibo. It accused Guangzhou Jianmou Information Technology Co., Ltd. of using malicious technical means to illegally call the server API (application programming interface) to capture a large amount of Weibo data, store and sell it, which constituted unfair competition, and then sued the court. The court of first instance held that Guangzhou Jianmou Information Technology Co., Ltd. constituted unfair competition and ordered it to compensate 20 million yuan for economic losses and 272,680 yuan for reasonable expenses for rights protection. Guangzhou Jianmou Information Technology Co., Ltd. refused to accept it and appealed. The Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province held that Beijing Jianmou Network Technology Co., Ltd. enjoys the rights and interests of independent control, lawful use and economic benefits of Weibo data held in accordance with laws and regulations. Guangzhou Jianmou Information Technology Co., Ltd. illegally calls the Weibo server API to capture a large amount of background data for storage by changing IP (network address), UID (user account number) and other deceptive technical methods, and sells it to unspecified Internet users without processing to make profits. This behavior significantly increases the risk of the Weibo platform being substantially replaced, and may also cause data security issues such as personal privacy and leakage of sensitive information. It violates the principles of fairness, integrity and business ethics, disrupts the competitive order of the data market, seriously damages the legitimate rights and interests of Beijing Weimou Network Technology Co., Ltd. and consumers, and constitutes unfair competition as stipulated in Article 2 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law. According to the median fee standard of 1 yuan/100 times of Guangzhou Jane Information Technology Co., Ltd., its profit is about 2179.79 million yuan. Based on the long duration of the alleged infringement, the huge scale of the call data, and the serious consequences of the damage, it is not improper to fully support the compensation request of Beijing Micro Network Technology Co., Ltd., so the judgment rejects the appeal and upholds the original judgment.
　　[Typical meaning] This case is a typical case of illegally capturing data for trading and reselling. The judgment is based on the balanced relationship between "strong protection" of data and "orderly circulation", and clarifies the boundaries of data rights protection. It reflects the clear judicial attitude of judicial trials to guide market entities to obtain and use data "in a good way and to a certain extent."
　　Seventh, criminal infringement of medical equipment software copyright
　　Case of copyright infringement by Liu Mousheng and Liu Mousheng [Shanghai Third Intermediate People’s Court (2023) Shanghai 03 Xingchu No. 23 criminal court verdict]
　　[Summary of the case] Since March 2019, defendant Liu Mousheng, for profit purposes, without the permission of copyright holders such as Ximou Medical System Co., Ltd., made dongles to avoid copyright technical protection measures, provided download links such as maintenance manuals, copied software such as Nebula Workstation without authorization, and sold the aforementioned dongles and pirated software through Xianyu account and other channels. Since July 2020, defendant Liu Mousheng instructed defendant Liu to open a Xianyu account to sell dongles and pirated software. During this period, defendant Liu Mousheng was responsible for making dongles, copying pirated software, putting goods on the shelves, sending express deliveries, etc., and defendant Liu was responsible for account customer service, collection, etc. After audit, the sales amounts of defendants Liu Mousheng and Liu were 1.06 million yuan and 140,000 yuan respectively. After identification, it was found that the dongles sold by the two defendants could avoid the technical protection measures taken by the copyright owner, and the pirated software sold was essentially the same as the copyright owner’s work. The Shanghai Third Intermediate People’s Court held that the two defendants, for the purpose of profit, copied and disseminated their works to the public through information networks without the permission of the copyright owner, and deliberately avoided the technical protection measures taken by the copyright owner for their works. Defendant Liu Mousheng’s circumstances are particularly serious. Defendant Liu’s circumstances are serious, and their actions have constituted the crime of copyright infringement. In a joint crime, the defendant Liu Mousheng is the principal offender; the defendant Liu is an accessory, and should be given a lighter punishment. Both defendants have confessed to the circumstances and can be given a lighter punishment; if they voluntarily plead guilty and accept the punishment, they can pay a fine in advance before the court, and can be given a lighter punishment. Therefore, the defendant Liu Mousheng was sentenced to three years and two months in prison and fined 700,000 yuan for the crime of copyright infringement; the defendant Liu was sentenced to one year in prison, suspended for one year, and fined 80,000 yuan. After the first-instance judgment, neither defendant appealed.
　　[Typical significance] This case is a typical criminal case of intentional avoidance of technical measures to infringe copyright after the implementation of the Criminal Law Amendment (XI). The judgment of this case clarified the relevant standards for criminal responsibility for avoidance or destruction of technical measures, fully protected the legitimate rights and interests of medical device software copyright owners, and demonstrated the strength and determination to strengthen the criminal judicial protection of intellectual property rights and serve the innovative development of the digital economy.
　　Eight, "Lentinan" infringement of technical secrets dispute case
　　Nanjing Hanmou Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd. and Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. infringement of technical secrets dispute case [Nanjing Intermediate People’s Court of Jiangsu Province (2019) Su 01 Minchu No. 3444 civil court verdict]
　　[Case summary] In 2004, Nanjing Hanmou Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd. and Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. signed the "Lentinan Mushroom Polysaccharide Project Cooperation Contract", agreeing that the former would provide the latter with technologies such as the production of Lentinan APIs; the products involved would be sold to the distributor designated by the former; the latter would compensate the former 20 million yuan for distributing it by itself or entrusting others; both parties should keep the technology of this project confidential, otherwise they would compensate according to the above agreement. Later, Nanjing Hanmou Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd. delivered the technical results to Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. as agreed. Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. obtained the registration and production approval of Lentinan APIs in 2006. In 2010, Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. transferred the shiitake mushroom polysaccharide technology to the outsider for 1 million yuan, and the aforementioned drug production enterprise was changed to the outsider. The outsider’s website publicized in 2014 that the shiitake mushroom polysaccharide API production line was officially put into production, and the annual output value would exceed 100 million yuan. Nanjing Hanmou Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd. then sued the court. The Nanjing Intermediate People’s Court of Jiangsu Province held that the technology involved in the case was non-public, valuable, and confidential, and constituted a technical secret. Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. transferred the technology substantially the same as the aforementioned technology to the outsider, which violated the confidentiality agreement and disclosed the technical secret to the outsider, which constituted infringement. According to the amount of compensation agreed by both parties, Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. was sentenced to compensate Nanjing Hanmou Pharm Dimou Pharmaceutical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. refused to accept and appealed. The Supreme People’s Court rejected the appeal and upheld the original judgment.
　　[Typical meaning] This case involves the protection of technical secrets of traditional Chinese medicine techniques such as the selection, processing and treatment of authentic shiitake mushroom raw materials. The judgment explores issues such as the identification of technical secrets of traditional authentic medicinal materials and compensation for illegal use of technical secrets, which is conducive to the application and development of traditional Chinese medicine technology and promotes the integrity and innovation of traditional Chinese medicine.
　　Nine, involving "Xiao Ai Classmate" wake-up word unfair competition dispute case
　　Xiaomou Technology Co., Ltd. and Chen and Shenzhen Yunmou Technology Co., Ltd. unfair competition dispute case [Wenzhou Intermediate People’s Court of Zhejiang Province (2023) Zhejiang 03 Minchu No. 423 civil court verdict]
　　[Case summary] Xiaomou Technology Co., Ltd. released the first artificial intelligence speaker with the wake-up word "Xiao Ai Classmate" in July 2017, and has since installed an artificial intelligence voice interaction engine using the wake-up word "Xiao Ai Classmate" in mobile phones, TVs and other products. From August 2017 to June 2020, Chen applied for the registration of 66 trademarks such as "Xiao Ai Classmate" in different product categories, and then sent a lawyer’s letter to the affiliated companies of Xiaomou Technology Co., Ltd. to request that it stop infringing its "Xiao Ai Classmate" trademark rights, and used the "Xiao Ai Classmate" trademark on sports watches, alarm clocks and other products with Shenzhen Yunmou Technology Co., Ltd. to jointly publish product promotional articles. Xiaomou Technology Co., Ltd. argued that the actions of Chen and Shenzhen Yunmou Technology Co., Ltd. constituted unfair competition, so it sued the court. The Wenzhou Intermediate People’s Court of Zhejiang Province held that "Xiao Ai Classmate" can be widely used as an influential wake-up word, the name of the artificial intelligence voice interaction engine, and the name of the smart speaker equipped with the artificial intelligence voice interaction engine. Protected by the Anti-Unfair Competition Law. Chen registered a large number of trademarks such as "Xiao Ai Classmate" and sent a lawyer’s letter to "stop infringement" to the affiliated enterprises of Xiaomou Technology Co., Ltd., which violated the principle of good faith, disrupted the fair market competition order, and damaged the legitimate rights and interests of Xiaomou Technology Co., Ltd., which is an act of unfair competition regulated by Article 2 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law. Chen and Shenzhen Yunmou Technology Co., Ltd. sold goods with the logo of "Xiao Ai Classmate" and released misleading commercial publicity information, which constituted confusion and false propaganda of unfair competition. Therefore, the judgment was immediately stopped, Chen compensated Xiaomou Technology Co., Ltd. for economic losses and reasonable expenses of 1.20 million yuan, and Shenzhen Yunmou Technology Co., Ltd. was jointly and severally liable for 250,000 yuan. After the first-instance judgment, none of the parties appealed.
　　[Typical meaning] This case is a typical case involving the protection of the rights and interests of artificial intelligence Keywords Spotting. The judgment of this case not only makes it clear that the use of wake-up words with certain influence belongs to the legitimate rights and interests protected by the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, but also effectively regulates the behavior of maliciously squatting other people’s wake-up words and abusing rights, fully protecting the brand goodwill of technological innovation enterprises.
　　Cases involving "juvenile model" unfair competition
　　Shenzhen Tengmou Computer System Co., Ltd. and Beijing Aimou Technology Co., Ltd. unfair competition dispute case [Tianjin Free Trade Zone People’s Court (2022) Jin 0319 Minchu No. 23977 civil court verdict]
　　[Case Summary] Shenzhen Teng Computer System Co., Ltd. and others have set up "Youth Mode" in the "Tencent Video" and "Tencent NOW Live" APP operated by them. When opening the above APP, a pop-up window prompt will pop up on the homepage. The guardian of the teenager can conveniently open the "Youth Mode". This mode is configured with high-quality content suitable for teenagers, restricts social and consumption functions such as recharging, tipping, and gift giving, and sets up an anti-addiction mechanism. In order to ensure the normal operation of the "Youth Mode", the service agreements of both APPs stipulate that users shall not interfere with or destroy the normal operation of the software, shall not add, delete, or change the functions or operation effects of the software, and shall not implement any behavior that endangers minors. The "anti-advertising tool" APP operated by Beijing Aimou Technology Co., Ltd. uses the "juvenile mode pop-up box automatic closing" function as a "member exclusive privilege", and guides users to open and use the function in a "free time" way, resulting in users being unable to use "juvenile mode" through the prominent pop-up window prompt popping up on the homepage of Shenzhen Tengmou Computer System Co., Ltd. Shenzhen Tengmou Computer System Co., Ltd. and others believed that Beijing Aimou Technology Co., Ltd. constituted unfair competition, so they sued the court. The People’s Court of Tianjin Free Trade Zone held that the blocking of "juvenile mode" by Beijing Aimou Technology Co., Ltd. was essentially an act of unfair competition that hindered and destroyed the normal operation of network products and services of Shenzhen Tengmou Computer System Co., Ltd. on the grounds of technological neutrality to obtain economic benefits, resulting in the failure of the company’s functional design to protect minors, which not only undermined the market order of fair competition and industry ecology, but also violated relevant laws and regulations for the protection of minors, hindered the long-term healthy development of online audio & video, live broadcast and other industries, and constituted unfair competition. Considering that the products of Shenzhen Teng Computer System Co., Ltd. have a greater impact on the adolescent group, Beijing Love Technology Co., Ltd. has a greater subjective fault, and the function of blocking adolescent mode covers a variety of application software. The influence range is wider, the number of downloads is more, and the duration is longer. Factors such as a long time, Beijing Love Technology Co., Ltd. was ordered to compensate for economic losses and reasonable expenses totaling 3 million yuan. After the first instance judgment, neither party appealed, and reached a pre-execution settlement.
　　[Typical meaning] This case is a typical case of blocking "juvenile model" unfair competition. The judge affirmed the positive role of "juvenile model" in safeguarding the rights and interests of minors online, and made a negative evaluation of the blocking of "juvenile model" through the application of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, and guided network service providers to consciously fulfill their network obligations and social responsibilities to protect minors.

The water is too deep, and this Volvo XC60, which is 40,000 lower than the market price, exposes the cheating tricks of used car dealers.

Hello, everyone, I’m Guangyao, the inspector of the car inspector. Although I look good, I’m an old driver who has repaired cars. Now I’m a used car inspector of the car inspector. It’s my duty to avoid everyone’s car purchase risks. Welcome to watch this interesting story about used car inspection.

Old drivers all know that the policy of restricting the relocation of used cars in the National Five-Year Plan has been liberalized, and the nationwide circulation has immediately formed a scale. For consumers, the convenience of buying cars in different places has been greatly improved! However, Guangyao reminds everyone that buying second-hand cars in different places is particularly easy to be pitted. Everyone should be cautious. Before looking at the car, hold the money bag tightly, and don’t give it out easily until you know the exact condition of the car, otherwise you may fall into the double torture of money and spirit! We have encountered too many such cases, so I will pick one out here to share with you, hoping to learn from it!

In other words, a good brother from Nanchang photographed a used car in Ningbo in a live broadcast room. In November 2018, 19 Volvo XC60 (parameter picture) four-wheel drive Zhiyuan version was licensed, and the market price was 200,000-210,000. As long as the live broadcast room was more than 180,000, the anchor said that the car had changed its front mouth, but it sold very cheaply. After the live broadcast room, there was no such price! My good brother thought, it’s not unacceptable to say anything before, so he paid a deposit of 10 thousand in advance and took the preferential places first! But eldest brother still has a little distrust of car dealers, so he entrusted Guangyao to do a comprehensive test!

Good brother himself was not present, and we kept online communication. When Guangyao heard him talk about the price, he had doubts. Can you get a discount of 30,000-40,000 yuan by changing the front set? I won’t believe Guangyao. It is estimated that the main structure of the car body should be damaged! Look at the real car! According to the address provided by the eldest brother, Guangyao came to the garage where the vehicle was located. Tell the car dealer what he came for, but the car dealer is also honest, saying that the front of the car hit and the airbag was blown up. See for yourself the rest! Guangyao took the car keys and started testing!

Car model: 2019 T5 four-wheel drive Zhiyuan Edition

Factory date: October, 2018

Apparent mileage: 75784KM

Official guidance: 421,900

Car dealer’s quotation: 185,800 yuan

Just look at the appearance, the color is still good! Since it is a set of front mouth, the front bumper must have been disassembled and replaced, and the inspection is indeed true. There are paint marks on the corners, and the details are rough, which is obviously not the original process!

The front cover is painted evenly on the whole surface, and then the inside is opened. At first glance, the fixing screws have no traces of turning off the paint, but don’t be confused by the surface phenomenon. If you look closely, you can find that the surface of the screws is painted, and the bottom circle has obvious displacement, which means that the screws must have been removed! Moreover, some holes on the inside of the cover are rough in workmanship and the color inside is wrong, indicating that the front cover has also been replaced!

Needless to say, the water tank frame, radiator, fan and headlights have not been replaced. Let’s focus on whether the structural parts have been moved!

The paint thickness of the left fender skeleton was measured, and the data came to 647μm, which is sheet metal shaping! The outer leaf iron sheet should also be reimbursed! Injury to the structural parts, this is not a simple front mouth set, it should be an accident car!

Look at the right fender skeleton again. Although the thickness of the paint on it is in the normal standard, the solder joints below are all redone through the gap observation. This is cutting and welding! It’s worse than the left!

Moreover, the thickness of the paint on the right shock absorber tower top is not quite right, which is much higher than that on the left, but the area is not large. It must have been painted, which should be related to the accident ahead!

Looking down at the right front longitudinal beam, although the deformation trace is not too obvious, it can still be seen with the naked eye! Seeing this situation, Guangyao probably knows what this XC60 is about! It’s not just a set of front mouths, it’s already a national standard major accident car! Take a small notebook and write it down first, and then see if there is any more damage under the chassis!

The engine was not damaged, and no traces of oil leakage were found. The intake manifold was just disassembled, probably by cleaning carbon deposits, and the problem was not serious!

The pawl screw is still in the original factory appearance, so it can be seen that the engine has not been hoisted and maintained. If the mileage is really more than 70,000, there will be basically nothing wrong with the engine and gearbox! It’s not time to break down!

After measuring the paint surface along the left, I quickly walked around and found that except for the original paint on the roof, none of the other places ran away, including the rear of the car! Partial sheet metal scraping putty, of course, this is also expected!

When entering the car, Volvo’s interior feels low-key and honest, less dazzling, but the materials and workmanship are more exquisite. In order to make the car have no odor, it is basically environmentally friendly materials, and the owner is practical!

First, look at the color of the interior, which depends on observing the main driver’s seat, door handle, steering wheel, window button, air conditioning button, accelerator brake pedal, gear handle, etc., which are often used at ordinary times. By comprehensive comparison, the overall wear and tear of the interior is not very serious, basically in line with the current mileage!

There is little difference between the mileage read by Obd computer and the meter, and the results obtained by running the average speed of conversion of time with the engine are basically the same, and the vehicle really has no meter adjustment!

The accident at the front of the car is not small. According to Volvo’s safety factor, the main driver’s airbag and seat belt will definitely trigger protection! Observe that the fixing screw of the seat belt has indeed been removed, but the manufacturing date conforms to the original assembly procedure. It is estimated that the locking mechanism inside has been repaired, and the original seat belt has not been changed! The airbag is better distinguished, the skin on the surface is obviously newer than the steering wheel, and the disassembly hole is also punctured!

The main driver’s seat has been removed, whether it was accidentally removed or for other reasons, there is no way to guarantee this! However, it is certain that there is no trace of sediment residue in the harness at the bottom of the seat! Combined with the steering column, threshold gap, under the carpet and other positions, Guangyao confirmed that there is no water soaking in the vehicle!

I thought the function buttons should be in good condition and effective, but I didn’t expect a light switch to fail! If this is repaired, it is estimated that the assembly will have to be replaced!

Finally, the detection of the chassis, which is also our most important project, has disappeared, leaving the engine and gearbox exposed! It is estimated that the fender was reimbursed by the front accident!

The fixing screw of the engine oil pan has been removed, and the color of the oil pan is obviously relatively new. It may be that the bottom is cracked and damaged, and it has been repaired and replaced, but as far as this problem is concerned, it is not serious!

There is nothing wrong with the gearbox oil pan, which is neither disassembled nor deformed! This 8AT gearbox is well matched with the 2.0T engine!

This is the point. Do you know where this is? This is the lower part of the top of the damping tower with high paint thickness. From below, it can be clearly seen that this piece is made up and has been cut and welded! This position is the same as the right front longitudinal beam, as long as there are deformation, cutting, welding, folding and other conditions, it can be directly designated as a major accident car!

The situation of the lower longitudinal beam is not much better, and the deformed position has not been corrected and maintained! It may be that the deformation is not large, so the repairman does not care!

There was another unexpected discovery under the chassis. The inner plate of the left rear fender was cut and welded. It seems that this XC60 has an accident in more than one place! Although the accident here is nothing compared with the previous one, it is also a big flaw! You must give feedback to customers! That’s why we should insist on detecting the chassis, because this position is not on the chassis, and we can’t see it at all!

There is no suspense in the conclusion of this XC60, a major accident car! I called my good brother to report the car condition. My good brother couldn’t believe it. Although I made preparations that the car condition didn’t meet expectations, it was too different! The front fender skeleton is cut, the rear fender inner panel is cut, the shock absorber seat is cut, and the longitudinal beam is deformed. This is not a sword stuck in the heart of the good brother, but four swords! Good brother, let Guangyao report the car inspection as soon as possible, so that he can return the car and refund the deposit!

But the deposit is not so easy to refund, and the car dealer has a hundred reasons to refuse you! Good brother tried to find the other party’s theory several times without a result, and went to the live broadcast room to complain and was blacked out! I thought I found a cheap one, but I didn’t expect it to be a protracted war! Big brother still has his own business to take care of, which makes him physically and mentally haggard! So, if you see a particularly cheap used car, you really need to keep your eyes open!

The fans nodded to show that they understood! Ok, that’s all for today’s testing sharing. I’m a used car testing technician from the car inspector. Like it, like it, and spray it if you don’t like it. I repair cars more, study less, and write poorly. Please bear with me. Car inspector, I would like to be your friend who knows cars best!

近期文章

近期评论

您尚未收到任何评论。

归档

分类

标签

2021苏州新茶论坛 2021魔都新茶论坛 上海419网友自荐 上海419论坛 上海后花园交友论坛 上海后花园会所 上海后花园最新论坛 上海后花园私人会所 上海后花园论坛 上海后花园龙凤 上海品茶网 上海夜场论坛 上海夜网 上海娱乐 上海娱乐地图 上海桑拿按摩上门 上海桑拿论坛 上海水磨会所 上海水磨外卖工作室 上海狼盟 上海花千坊会所 上海茶馆 上海龙凤 佛山桑拿蒲友网 南京夜生活 南京夜生活交流 南京夜生活品茶网论坛 南京夜生活娱乐 南京新茶外卖论坛 南京高端私人微信群 夜上海论坛 广州蒲典网 杭州夜网论坛 杭州桑拿 江浙沪品茶网论坛 爱上海同城交友 爱上海 女生自荐区 苏州喝茶服务vx 苏州夜生活 西安夜生活桑拿论坛 西安夜生活论坛 西安桑拿网 贵族宝贝 阿拉上海后花园 阿拉 后花园 龙凤

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Appointment Red by Webriti